In
2015, 1.69 million new cases of lung cancer were diagnosed worldwide, making
lung cancer the most common form of cancer in the world. As a result, many
people tend to associate the addictive effects of nicotine with the negative
effects associated with smoking. However, decades of research have actually
provided evidence against this idea. Yes, nicotine is responsible for the
addictive nature of cigarettes (and other tobacco products) and therefore keeps
people hooked even after they’ve been made aware of the negative effects of
tobacco use and even after loved ones have been diagnosed with other forms of
cancer. But one should always remember that correlation does not equal
causation. That is to say, nicotine alone not only has few negative side effects
associated with its use but has actually demonstrated to be quite beneficial
for a number of different ailments. More specifically, nicotine has been shown
to improve attentiveness in smokers (Wesnes and Warburton 1983), Alzheimer’s
patients (Sahakian and Jones 1991), and schizophrenics (Levin et al. 1996).
Even more interesting are studies that have demonstrated that the
administration of a 7.5 mg transdermal patch for a 4.5 hr session can improve
attentiveness in adult non-smokers as well (Levin et al., 1998). The former
study is of the most interest to me given the potential cognitive benefits that
millions of people could obtain worldwide from the use of non-tobacco based
nicotine.
Obviously
other side effects may occur as well due to the use of non-tobacco based
nicotine; one must always consider the potential for maleficence. The most
pertinent potential side effect being the possibility that the use of non-tobacco based nicotine
could eventually lead to the use of tobacco products, which are closely linked
with various forms of cancer. Additionally, it is likely that individuals would
experience an increase in nicotine tolerance over an extended duration of use.
I am therefore interested to see if the reliance on greater doses of nicotine
may be correlated with an increased likelihood to begin using tobacco products,
as these products are often a less expensive way to obtain nicotine, based on
one’s specific location and the taxes that may or may not be relevant to that
specific area. Regardless, it is good to see a variety of treatments being
developed for various cognitive disorders.
Levin,
E. D., Conners, C. K., Silva, D., Hinton, S. C., Meck, W. H., March, J., &
Rose, J. E. (1998). Transdermal nicotine effects on attention. Psychopharmacology,
140(2), 135-141.
Levin
E., Wilson W., Rose J., McEvoy J. (1996). Nicotine-haloperidol interactions and
cognitive performance in schizophrenics. Neuropsychopharmacology, 15,
429-436.
Sahakian,
B.J., Jones, G.M.M. (1991). The effects of nicotine on attention, information
processing, and working memory in patients with dementia of the Alzheimer type.
In: Adlkofer F, Thruau K (eds) Effects of nicotine on biological systems.
Birkhäuser Basel, 623-230.
Wesnes,
K., & Warburton, D. M. (1983). Smoking, nicotine and human performance. Pharmacology
& therapeutics, 21(2), 189-208.
https://www.lung.org/lung-health-and-diseases/lung-disease-lookup/lung-cancer/resource-library/lung-cancer-fact-sheet.html
I think that this is very interesting to note. I for one have always related nicotine to negative affects. This is something that people should understand. Nicotine gets a lot of bad reputation from its correlation to smoking and therefore lung cancer. If we truly think about its affects of increasing alertness while feeling calm at the same time there can be benefits in things such as ADHD and schizophrenia. The addiction portion of this drug comes from the brain's reward system which is very similar to prescription stimulants, which makes it very addicting. I found it interesting to read that nicotine related drugs may not be on the market due to its reputation and correlation to cancer. At this rate the words nicotine, smoking, and cancer all go hand in hand with a negative connotation with them. If a new drug were introduced into society, a lot of science and benefits would have to back it up in order to even scratch the surface on its reputation.
ReplyDeletehttps://www.health.harvard.edu/newsletter_article/Nicotine_It_may_have_a_good_side
What a coincidience?! My externship is actually conducting research on nicotine exposure in drosophilia. The present experiment is based off of a previous study where they found several ion channels that affected drosophilia wing development when disrupted. Two of these channels were nicotinic acetylcholine receptors and are also human orthologs. So, now we are exposing drosophilia larva to nicotine (yes, we are vaping our flies...shout out to Juul) to see if the nicotine alone affects wing development. Significant results could have huge implications for vaping during pregnancy. I’ve heard that some pregnant smokers switch to vaping because it’s “safer”. I’m hesitant to share the paper for the previous study with you as it is not yet published but stay tuned for the vaping results!
ReplyDelete